| May 25, 2006 (minor revisions July 25, 2006)
Brian Leiter's Best Law Schools for the "Best" Jobs in Law Teaching
This study examined which schools are most successful at placing their graduates in "top" law school teaching positions. "Top" law schools for this purpose meant schools that either (1) are ranked in the top 50 by U.S. News with some frequency, or (2) are ranked in the top 40 for faculty quality by various academic measures in my rankings. The following schools, therefore, were in the sample:
Arizona State University; Baylor University; Cardozo Law School/Yeshiva University; Boston College; Boston University; Brigham Young University; Brooklyn Law School; Case Western Reserve University; Chicago-Kent College of Law; Columbia University; Cornell University; Duke University; Emory University; Florida State University; Fordham University; George Mason University; Georgetown University; George Washington University; Harvard University; University of California-Hastings College of Law; Indiana University, Bloomington; New York University; Northwestern University; University of Notre Dame; Ohio State University; Rutgers University, Camden; Rutgers University, Newark; Southern Methodist University; Stanford University; Tulane University; University of Alabama; University of Arizona; University of California, Berkeley; University of California, Davis; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Chicago; University of Cincinnati; University of Colorado, Boulder; University of Connecticut; University of Florida; University of Georgia; University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; University of Iowa; University of Maryland; University of Miami; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; University of Minnesota; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; University of Pennsylvania; University of Pittsburgh; University of San Diego; University of Southern California; University of Texas, Austin; University of Virginia; University of Washington; University of Wisconsin, Madison; Vanderbilt University; Wake Forest University; Washington & Lee University; Washington College of Law, American University; Washington University, St. Louis; College of William & Mary; Yale University.
The educational background of all tenure-track (but not tenured) faculty at these schools, according to school websites, was recorded during Spring 2006. This data was supplemented by data collected by me (www.leiterlawschool.typepad.com) and Larry Solum (http://lsolum.blogspot.com/archives/2006_05_01_lsolum_archive.html#114129865560132000) about the educational background of tenure-track hires for the 2006-07 academic year. Because the study was confined to current untenured, but tenure-stream, academic faculty, it gives the most up-to-date picture of which schools are best at producing successful young law teachers.
Because of the many variables affecting placement in law teaching, no ordinal ranking of schools makes sense. Instead, five “clusters” of schools were identified in terms of their success at producing law teachers at top schools. The clusters factored in the following considerations: (1) the total number of graduates who secured “top” teaching jobs; (2) the typical size of the student body (based on the most recent ABA data on matriculants in the first-year class); (3) the quality of the jobs secured by graduates (with some discount for schools “hiring their own”); (4) the number of graduates who needed to earn an additional degree before securing a teaching position.
As the sample size grew smaller, the ability to draw meaningful distinctions becomes shakier. For example, Duke, with four grads in “top” jobs, looks quite a bit better than Cornell, a school of about the same size, with only two; yet 75% of the Duke grads had advanced degrees, compared to just 50% of the Cornell grads—but those numbers might change significantly with just one more placement! Hence, Duke and Cornell are in the same cluster. In summary form, here they are (schools are listed alphabetically within each cluster):
Group 1 (1)
Yale Law School
Group 2 (2-4)
Harvard Law School
Stanford Law School
University of Chicago Law School
Group 3 (5-8)
Columbia Law School
New York University School of Law
University of California, Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law
University of Michigan Law School
Group 4 (9)
University of Virginia Law School
Group 5 (10-17)
Cornell Law School
Duke University School of Law
Georgetown University Law Center
Northwestern University School of Law
University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
University of Minnesota Law School
University of Pennsylvania Law School
University of Texas School of Law
Here is a more detailed chart with the underlying data.
School |
Number of Grads
in "Top" Jobs |
Most Recent Class Size (rounded to nearest 25) |
Total Number of Grads in Top Jobs Divided by Recent Class Size
|
Number of Grads
who Earned an Add'l Degree
(% of total placement)
[rank among top 18—higher
rank means fewer grads
earned degrees beyond JD]
|
Sample of Best Jobs
Secured by Grads
(max. of 8 listed) |
Group 1 (1)
|
Yale Law School |
92 |
200 |
.46 |
53 (58%) [#12] |
Yale, Harvard (3), Stanford, Chicago (2), NYU (2), Columbia (3), Michigan (6), Virginia (5) |
Group 2 (2-4) |
Harvard Law School |
78 |
550 |
.14 |
32 (41%)[#6] |
Harvard (2), Stanford, Chicago (2), Columbia (2), Berkeley (3), Michigan (4), Penn (2), Texas |
Stanford Law School |
21 |
175 |
.12 |
15 (71%)[#14] |
Columbia (2), Virginia, Texas, Cornell, Georgetown, UCLA, USC, Washington, North Carolina |
University of Chicago Law School |
26 |
200 |
.13 |
10 (39%) [#4] |
Chicago (2), Columbia, Texas, Virginia (3), Minnesota, Emory, George Mason (2), Fordham |
Group 3 (5-8)
|
Columbia Law School |
24 |
375 |
.06 |
11 (46%) [#7] |
Columbia, Michigan, Virginia, Cornell, UCLA, Wisconsin (2), Washington, Illinois |
New York University School of Law |
14 |
450 |
.03 |
4 (29%) [#1] |
NYU, UCLA, Vanderbilt, UC Davis, Wash U/St. Louis, Tulane (3), Arizona, Maryland (2) |
University of California, Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law |
13 |
275 |
.05 |
11 (85%)[#17] |
Penn, Duke, UCLA, Wisconsin (2), Emory, Iowa, William & Mary (2), UC Davis |
University of Michigan Law School |
18 |
375 |
.05 |
7 (39%)[#4] |
Chicago (2), Michigan, Minnesota, GW, Arizona, Emory, UC Davis (2), Boston College |
Group 4 (9) |
University of Virginia School of Law |
8 |
375 |
.02 |
4 (50%)[#8] |
Harvard, Virginia (2), Emory, William & Mary, Georgia, Rutgers-Camden, Arizona State |
Group 5 (10-17) |
Cornell Law School |
2 |
200 |
.01 |
1 (50%)[#8] |
Iowa, Arizona |
Duke University School of Law |
4 |
200 |
.02 |
3 (75%)[#15] |
Vanderbilt, Tulane (2), Florida State |
Georgetown University Law Center |
3 |
575 |
.01 |
1 (33%)[#2] |
Wisconsin, Indiana, Georgia |
Northwestern University School of Law |
4 |
250 |
.02 |
3 (75%)[#15] |
Minnesota, North Carolina, Florida, Alabama |
University of California, Los Angeles School of Law |
4 |
325 |
.01 |
1 (33%)[#2] |
Colorado, San Diego, George Mason, Wash U/St. Louis |
University of Minnesota Law School |
2 |
275 |
.01 |
1 (50%)[#8] |
Wisconsin, Colorado |
University of Pennsylvania Law School |
3 |
250 |
.01 |
2 (66%)[#13] |
Arizona State, Rutgers-Camden, Wake Forest |
University of Texas School of Law |
4 |
450 |
.01 |
2 (50%)[#8] |
Illinois, Washington, Tulane, Cincinnati |
Notable Showings in this Study, But Atypical from Earlier Periods |
University of Illinois College of Law |
2 |
200 |
.01 |
2 (100%) |
Georgia, Utah |
University of Maryland School of Law |
3 |
250 |
.01 |
2 (66%) |
Washington & Lee, Maryland, Utah |
Brigham Young University School of Law |
2 |
150 |
.01 |
1 (50%) |
Georgia, Florida State |
Tulane Law School |
2 |
300 |
.01 |
0 (0%) |
Georgetown, Washington & Lee |
|
|