Top Ten Ranking Brian Leiter's Law School Rankings

 ¶  Brian Leiter's Top 40 Faculties Based on Per Capita Scholarly Impact (Citations), 2003-04

buy crestor no prescription
buy symbicort no prescription
buy flomax no prescription
buy travatan no prescription
buy pristiq no prescription
buy imitrex no prescription
buy nexium no prescription
buy lamisil no prescription
buy medrol no prescription
buy minocycline no prescription
buy biaxin no prescription
buy famvir no prescription
buy cephalexin no prescription
buy arimidex no prescription
buy zithromax no prescription

 ◊  Advertise Here!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 16, 2003

This is a ranking of the top 40 law faculties based on a standard “objective” measure of scholarly impact:  per capita citations to faculty scholarship.  We looked only at the top quarter of each faculty, largely for logistical reasons--it made the study more manageable--but partly because the scholarly standing of a school depends more on its best faculty, than its average. 

Impact was measured using Westlaw's JRL database rather than TP-ALL, since the latter includes on-line versions of treatises (for example, Wright & Miller on Federal Practice & Procedure) and thus would artificially inflate the counts for schools at which these treatise authors teach.  Names were searched as,

            Brian /2 Leiter

except where multiple middle initials or similar factors made necessary a wider scope.  To guard against false positives with common names, ten to twenty of the "hits" were reviewed; the percentage that were false positives was then multiplied against the total number of hits returned, and that amount was subtracted from the citation total.  To fix the top quarter it was, of course, necessary to search one-third to one-half of the faculty.  The citation counts were completed over the course of several days in July 2003—roughly, five years after the study that was published in Journal of Legal Studies in 2000--thus obviating the need for adjustments in the counts to reflect changes in the size of the database. 

Impact as measured by citations has important limitations as a proxy for scholarly reputation, and it is worth noting those in detail before going further.  Why might the correlation between impact and actual academic quality break down?  Richard

Since many frequently cited articles are cited because they contain succinct statements of boilerplate propositions of law or of a particular academic approach to some set of issues, or because they fall squarely within a particular academic paradigm whose proponents make a practice of citing each other, the frequency of an author's citations has little to do with his influence, much less with the quality of his work.  (“The Professional Assessment of Legal Academics,” 48 Journal of Legal Education, 417, 423-4 [1998].)

Although Markovits leaps too quickly to his conclusion, he has certainly identified a genuine worry about the use of citations.  Indeed, we might identify six kinds of phenomena at work here which skew the correlation between citation and quality. 

First, there is the industrious drudge:  the competent but uninspired scholar who simply churns out huge amounts of writing in his or her field.  Citation practices of law reviews being what they are, the drudge quickly reaches the threshold level of visibility at which one is obliged to cite his or her work in the obligatory early footnotes of any article in that field.  The work is neither particularly good, nor especially creative or groundbreaking, but it is there and everyone knows it is there and it must be duly acknowledged. 

Second, there is the treatise writer, whose treatise is standardly cited because like the output of the drudge it is a recognized reference point in the literature.  Unlike the drudge, the authors of leading treatises are generally very accomplished scholars, but with the devaluation of doctrinal work over the past twenty years, an outstanding treatise writer--with a few exceptions--is not necessarily highly regarded as a legal scholar.

Third, there is the “academic surfer,” who surfs the wave of the latest fad to sweep the legal academy, and thus piles up citations because law reviews, being creatures of fashion, give the fad extensive exposure.  Any study counting citations, depending on when it is conducted, runs the risk of registering the "impact" of the fad in disproportion to its scholarly merit or long-term value or interest.

Fourth, there is work that is cited because it constitutes “the classic mistake”:  some work is so wrong, or so bad, that everyone acknowledges it for that reason.  The citation and organizational preferences of student-edited law reviews exacerbate this problem.  Since the typical law-review article must first reinvent the wheel, by surveying what has come before, the classic mistake will earn an obligatory citation in article after article in a particular field, even though the point of the article may be to show how wrong the classic mistake is.  True, some authors of classic mistakes may have excellent reputations; but who among us aspires to be best remembered for a "grand" mistake?

Fifth, citation tallies are skewed towards more senior faculty, so that faculties with lots of “bright young things” (as the Dean of one famous law school likes to call top young scholars) won’t fare as well, while faculties with once-productive dinosaurs will.

Sixth, citation studies are highly field-sensitive.  Law reviews publish lots on constitutional law, and very little on tax.  Scholars in the public law fields or who work in critical theory get lots of cites; scholars who work on trusts, comparative law, and legal philosophy do not.

So for all these reasons, one would expect scholarly impact to be an imperfect measure of scholarly quality.  But an imperfect measure may still be an adequate measure, and that is almost certainly true of citation rates as a proxy for impact as a proxy for reputation or quality. 

The overall ranking was based not only on mean per capita impact for the top quarter of each faculty, but also the median per capita impact.  This was to guard against the distorting effect of having one or two faculty with enormously high citation counts on an otherwise low-cited faculty.  (The data on mean and median per capita impact follow the overall ranking.)  The final score—the basis for the “overall” ranking that follows--is the sum of the normalized scores for mean and median per capita impact divided by two.  For ease of reference, results of the Spring 2003 EQR reputational survey are included in the far right column.

Brian Leiter's Overall Top 40 Based on Mean and Median Per Capita Impact, 2003-04

Rank School Score Reputation Rank

  1

University of Chicago

100

  2 (4.7)

  2

Yale University

  62

  1 (4.8)

  3

Harvard University

  55

  2 (4.7)

  4

Stanford University

  52

  4 (4.5)

  5

Columbia University

  44

  5 (4.3)

  6

University of California, Berkeley

  40

  7 (4.2)

  7

New York University

  37

  5 (4.3)

  8

Georgetown University

  34

12 (3.8)

  9

Cornell University

  28

14 (3.7)

10

University of Michigan

  25

  8 (4.1)

11

University of Texas, Austin

  24

  8 (4.1)

 

University of Virginia

  24

10 (4.0)

13

Northwestern University

  22

14 (3.7)

 

University of Pennsylvania

  22

11 (3.9)

15

Duke University

  20

17 (3.5)

 

University of Colorado, Boulder

  20

40 (2.5)

 

University of Miami

  20

40 (2.5)

18

Emory University

  19

29 (2.8)

 

University of California, Los Angeles

  19

14 (3.7)

20

George Washington University

  18

22 (3.1)

21

University of Illinois

  17

22 (3.1)

 

University of Southern California

  17

12 (3.8)

23

George Mason University

  16

26 (3.0)

 

Vanderbilt University

  16

18 (3.4)

25

Arizona State University

  15

40 (2.5)

 

Boston University

  15

19 (3.3)

 

Brooklyn Law School

  15

46 (2.4)

 

University of Arizona

  15

40 (2.5)

 

University of Minnesota

  15

21 (3.2)

30

University of Pittsburgh

  14

N/A (2.2)

 

University of San Diego

  14

22 (3.1)

 

Washington University, St. Louis

  14

29 (2.8)

33

Cardozo Law School

  13

28 (2.9)

 

Chicago-Kent College of Law

  13

37 (2.6)

 

Fordham University

  13

26 (3.0)

 

Ohio State University

  13

32 (2.7)

 

University of Iowa

  13

19 (3.3)

38

University of California, Davis

  12

32 (2.7)

 

University of California, Hastings

  12

29 (2.8)

 

University of Wisconsin, Madison

  12

22 (3.1)

  Other Schools Studied (some schools not studied might have performed comparably)    
 

Indiana University, Bloomington

  11

40 (2.5)

 

University of Florida

  11

46 (2.4)

 

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

  11

32 (2.7)

 

Boston College

  10

32 (2.7)

 

University of Notre Dame

  10

46 (2.4)

 

Washington & Lee University

  10

32 (2.7)

 

College of William & Mary

    9

37 (2.6)

 

Rutgers University, Camden

    9

37 (2.6)

 

Rutgers University, Newark

    9

46 (2.4)

What should one make of the discrepancies between per capita citation rates and reputation scores?  In my opinion, for example, Chicago is clearly not the best law faculty in the country, and Yale is.  Chicago’s dominance in the citation measure brings out some of the weaknesses of the measure, notably its inability to distinguish between quantity and quality.  To be sure, much of the work at Chicago (and Harvard and Stanford etc.) is of high quality, but the quantity in almost every case is higher.  This is why informed scholarly judgment by leading experts is important for the evaluation of the intellectual caliber of faculties.

Any school strong in a “high citation” field—like the critical theories of law—will fare well in this kind of study as well, even though opinion about the quality of this kind of work varies widely, and is more likely to surface in a reputational study than a citation study (cf. citation and reputation results for, e.g., Georgetown and Pittsburgh).  (Lists of the most cited faculty by school, and their areas of expertise, follow below, and allow a student to see which faculty, in what areas, account for a school’s strong showing.)

In other cases, the differences have simple explanations:  for example, since the reputational survey, Emory added Martha Fineman from Cornell, a leading (and much-cited) figure in family law and feminist legal theory. 

Brian Leiter's Ranking by Mean Per Capita Impact for the Top Quarter of Each Faculty

All per capita scores were rounded to the nearest 10.  The 1998 mean per capita impact rank for the top quarter of each faculty comes from Brian Leiter, “Measuring the Academic Distinction of Law Faculties,” 39 Journal of Legal Studies 451, 489 (2000).  N/A means the school was not in the top 40 in 1998.

Rank

School

Per Capita Cite Amount

Normalized Score

1998 Impact Rank

  1

University of Chicago

4350

100

  1

  2

Yale University

2250

  52

  2

  3

Harvard University

2000

  46

  3

  4

Stanford University

1710

  39

  4

  5

Univ. of California, Berkeley

1480

  34

  9

  6

Columbia University

1360

  31

  8

 

New York University

1350

  31

  5

  8

Georgetown University

1220

  28

11

  9

Cornell University

1060

  24

  7

10

University of Michigan

  930

  21

10

11

Univ. of Pennsylvania

  850

  20

13

 

Univ. of Texas, Austin

  860

  20

14

13

Northwestern University

  810

  19

15

14

University of Miami

  790

  18

23

 

University of Virginia

  780

  18

17

16

Duke University

  700

  16

18

 

Emory University

  700

  16

39

 

Univ. of California, Los Angeles

  680

  16

19

 

Univ. of Southern California

  710

  16

21

20

George Mason University

  650

  15

24

21

George Washington University

  600

  14

25

 

University of Colorado, Boulder

  610

  14

12

 

University of Illinois

  610

  14

16

24

University of Iowa

  550

  13

22

 

University of Pittsburgh

  570

  13

N/A

 

Vanderbilt University

  570

  13

28

27

Boston University

  540

  12

33

 

Chicago-Kent College of Law

  510

  12

34

 

University of Arizona

  540

  12

20

 

University of Minnesota

  520

  12

  6

 

University of San Diego

  500

  12

N/A

 

Washington University, St. Louis

  540

  12

38

33

Arizona State University

  490

  11

N/A

 

Brooklyn Law School

  480

  11

32

 

Univ. of California, Davis

  480

  11

35

36

Cardozo Law School

  440

  10

40

 

Fordham University

  430

  10

N/A

 

Ohio State University

  440

  10

N/A

39

Rutgers University, Camden

  390

    9

36

 

Univ. of California, Hastings

  390

    9

N/A

 

University of Florida

  390

    9

N/A

 

University of North Carolina

  400

    9

N/A

 

Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison

  390

    9

26

  Other Schools Studied      
 

Indiana University, Bloomington

  360

    8

30

 

College of William & Mary

  340

    8

N/A

 

Boston College

  330

    8

N/A

 

University of Notre Dame

  330

    8

27

 

Rutgers University, Newark

  310

    7

37

 

Washington & Lee University

  300

    7

N/A

Brian Leiter's Ranking by the Median Per Capita Impact for the Top Quarter of Each Faculty

Rank School Per Capita Cite Amount Normalized Score

  1

University of Chicago

2540

100

  2

Yale University

1810

  71

  3

Stanford University

1620

  64

  4

Harvard University

1590

  63

  5

Columbia University

1435

  57

  6

Univ. of California, Berkeley

1175

  46

  7

New York University

1060

  42

  8

Georgetown University

  985

  39

  9

Cornell University

  805

  32

10

University of Michigan

  740

  29

 

University of Virginia

  735

  29

12

University of Texas, Austin

  705

  28

13

Northwestern University

  625

  25

 

University of Colorado, Boulder

  640

  25

15

Duke University

  610

  24

 

University of Pennsylvania

  620

  24

17

Emory University

  555

  22

 

George Washington University

  555

  22

 

University of Miami

  550

  22

20

Univ. of California, Los Angeles

  535

  21

21

University of Illinois

  500

  20

22

Arizona State University

  480

  19

 

Brooklyn Law School

  480

  19

24

Boston University

  445

  18

 

University of Arizona

  450

  18

 

University of Minnesota

  465

  18

 

Vanderbilt University

  460

  18

28

Univ. of Southern California

  430

  17

29

Fordham University

  410

  16

 

George Mason University

  395

  16

31

Cardozo Law School

  390

  15

 

Ohio State University

  390

  15

 

Univ. of California, Hastings

  370

  15

 

University of San Diego

  370

  15

35

Chicago-Kent College of Law

  350

  14

 

University of Pittsburgh

  350

  14

 

Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison

  355

  14

38

Indiana University, Bloomington

  320

  13

 

Univ. of California, Davis

  340

  13

 

University of Florida

  340

  13

 

University of Iowa

  325

  13

  Other Schools Studied    
 

Washington & Lee University

  315

  12

 

University of North Carolina

  300

  12

 

Boston College

  290

  11

 

University of Notre Dame

  300

  12

 

Rutgers University, Newark

  265

  10

 

College of William & Mary

  240

    9

 

Rutgers University, Camden

  240

    9

Below are the lists of the most cited faculty at each school, with a brief description of their areas, using the following (crude) categories:

  • Public: constitutional law, legislation, administrative law, civil rights, federal Indian law.
  • Private: contracts, torts, property.
  • Procedure: civil procedure, complex litigation, evidence.
  • Family: family law, marital relations, children’s rights.
  • Health: health law, bioethics, disability law.
  • International:  international law
  • IP: intellectual property, patents, Cyberlaw, copyright, trademarks, computer law.
  • Comparative: comparative law
  • Criminal: criminal law and procedure
  • Law & Econ: law and economics, public choice theory, positive political theory, behavioral law and economics
  • Law & Social Science: poli sci, psychology, sociology, anthropology.
  • Jurisprudence: legal philosophy and non-philosophical legal theory.
  • Critical Theories: Critical Legal Studies, feminist legal theory, Critical Race Theory, Gay Legal Studies, Postmodern legal theory
  • Business: corporate, securities, commercial law, bankruptcy, antitrust
  • Environmental: self-explanatory, plus natural resource
  • Labor/Employment: self-explanatory.
  • Legal Ethics: also includes professional responsibility and legal profession
  • Legal History: self-explanatory
  • Wills: wills, trusts and/or estates
  • Tax: self-explanatory

An * indicates a part-time faculty member.

Remember that these lists are tilted heavily towards more senior faculty, because of the measure (total citations).  In every case, these lists omit faculty who would, by common consensus, be regarded as equally or more distinguished than those who make the lists.  The omissions are attributable to the predictable factors:  primarily, seniority and areas of expertise. 

1.  University of Chicago

Faculty member Areas

David P. Currie

Public

* Frank Easterbrook

Business, Law & Econ

Richard A. Epstein

Public, Private, Law & Econ

Daniel R. Fischel

Business, Law & Econ

William M. Landes

Law & Econ

* Catharine MacKinnon

Critical Theories, Public

* Richard A. Posner

Law & Econ, Private, Jurisprudence

Geoffrey R. Stone

Public

Cass R. Sunstein

Public

2.  Yale University

Faculty member Areas

Bruce A. Ackerman

Public

Akhil Reed Amar

Public

Ian Ayres

Law & Econ

* Guido Calabresi

Law & Econ, Private

Stephen L. Carter

Public

Robert C. Ellickson

Law & Econ, Private

William N. Eskridge

Public, Critical Theories

Owen M. Fiss

Public

Anthony T. Kronman

Private, Legal Ethics, Jurisprudence

Jerry L. Mashaw

Public

Robert C. Post

Public

George L. Priest

Law & Econ, Business, Private

Peter H. Schuck

Public

3.  Harvard University

Faculty member Areas

Lucian Bebchuk

Business, Law & Econ

Richard H. Fallon, Jr.

Public

Charles Fried

Public

Mary Ann Glendon

Comparative, Public

Lani Guinier

Critical Theories, Public

Morton J. Horwitz

Legal History, Critical Theories

Louis Kaplow

Law & Econ

Duncan Kennedy

Critical Theories

Randall L. Kennedy

Public

Reinier H. Kraakman

Business, Law & Econ

Frank I. Michelman

Public

Arthur R. Miller

Procedure

Martha L. Minow

Critical Theories, Public

Robert H. Mnookin

Family, ADR

David L. Shapiro

Public, Procedure

Steven Shavell

Law & Econ, Private

Laurence H. Tribe

Public

Roberto M. Unger

Critical Theories

Detlev F. Vagts

International

Paul Weiler

Labor/Employment

4.  Stanford University

Faculty member Areas

Lawrence M. Friedman

Legal History

* Ronald J. Gilson

Business, Law & Econ

Paul Goldstein

IP

Thomas C. Grey

Public, Jurisprudence

Mark G. Kelman

Critical Theories

Lawrence Lessig

Public, IP

A. Mitchell Polinsky

Law & Econ

Margaret Jane Radin

IP, Critical Theories

Deborah L. Rhode

Legal Ethics

Kathleen M. Sullivan

Public

5.  Columbia University

Faculty member Areas

John C. Coffee, Jr.

Business, Law & Econ, Procedure

* Kimberle Crenshaw

Critical Theories, Public

Michael C. Dorf

Public

Allan Farnsworth

Private

George P. Fletcher

Criminal

Ronald J. Gilson

Business, Law & Econ

Jane C. Ginsburg

IP

R. Kent Greenawalt

Public, Jurisprudence

Samuel Issacharoff

Public, Procedure, Law & Econ

Thomas W. Merrill

Public, Private

Henry P. Monaghan

Public

Joseph Raz

Jurisprudence

William H. Simon

Legal Ethics, Critical Theories

Peter L. Strauss

Public

Jeremy J. Waldron

Jurisprudence

Patricia J. Williams

Critical Theories

6.  University of California, Berkeley

Faculty member Areas

Kathryn Abrams

Critical Theories, Public

Jesse H. Choper

Public

Robert Cooter

Law & Econ

Melvin A. Eisenberg

Business, Public

Daniel A. Farber

Public, Environmental

Philip Frickey

Public

Angela P. Harris

Critical Theories

Herma Hill Kay

Procedure, Critical Theories

Mark A. Lemley

IP

Robert P. Merges

IP

Pamela Samuelson

IP

Stephen Sugarman

Private

Oliver Williamson

Law & Econ

Franklin Zimring

Criminal

7.  New York University

Faculty member Areas

Anthony G. Amsterdam

Criminal

Derrick A. Bell, Jr.

Critical Theories, Public

Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss

Procedure, IP

Ronald Dworkin

Jurisprudence, Public

Samuel Estreicher

Labor/Employment

Barry Friedman

Public

Stephen Gillers

Legal Ethics

Carol Gilligan

Critical Theories

Henry Hansmann

Business, Law & Econ

Lewis A. Kornhauser

Law & Econ

Larry Kramer

Public, Procedure

Andreas F. Lowenfeld

International

Theodor Meron

International

Geoffrey P. Miller

Business, Law & Econ, Jurisprudence

William E. Nelson

Legal History

Burt Neuborne

Public

Richard H. Pildes

Public

Richard L. Revesz

Environmental, Law & Econ

David A.J. Richards

Public

Stephen Schulhofer

Criminal

Richard B. Stewart

Public, Environmental

8.  Georgetown University

Faculty member Areas

T. Alexander Aleinikoff

Public

Barry E. Carter

International

David D. Cole

Public

Lawrence Gostin

Health

John H. Jackson

International

Vicki C. Jackson

Public, Comparative

Neal K. Katyal

Public

Donald C. Langevoort

Business

Charles R. Lawrence

Critical Theories, Public

Richard J. Lazarus

Environmental

David J. Luban

Legal Ethics

Mari J. Matsuda

Critical Theories

Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow

Law & Social Science, Critical Theories

Gary Peller

Critical Theories, Public

Robert Pitofsky

Business

Steven C. Salop

Law & Econ

Louis Michael Seidman

Public

Mark V. Tushnet

Public, Critical Theories, Legal History

Edith Brown Weiss

International

Robin L. West

Public, Critical Theories

9.  Cornell University

Faculty Member Areas

Gregory S. Alexander

Wills, Private, Legal History

Kevin M. Clermont

Procedure

Theodore Eisenberg

Law & Social Science, Business, Public

James A. Henderson

Private

Jonathan R. Macey

Business, Law & Econ

Stewart J. Schwab

Law & Social Science, Labor/Employment

Steven H. Shiffrin

Public

Robert S. Summers

Business, Jurisprudence

10.  University of Michigan

Faculty member Areas

Evan Caminker

Public

Edward H. Cooper

Procedure

Steven P. Croley

Private, Ad & Environ

Samuel R. Gross

Criminal, Law & Social Science

* Yale Kamisar

Criminal

James E. Krier

Private, Ad & Environ, Law & Econ

Richard O. Lempert

Law & Social Science, Procedure

* Catharine MacKinnon

Critical Theories, Public

Carl E. Schneider

Legal Ethics, Health, Public

A.W.B. Simpson

Legal History

Peter Westen

Criminal, Procedure, Jurisprudence

James Boyd White

Law & Literature

James J. White

Business

11.  University of Texas, Austin

Faculty member Areas

Lynn A. Baker

Public, Law & Econ, Legal Ethics

Philip C. Bobbitt

Public

Frank B. Cross

Law & Econ, Environmental, Public

Lino A. Graglia

Public

* Robert W. Hamilton

Business

Douglas Laycock

Public, Private, Procedure

Sanford Levinson

Public

Thomas O. McGarity

Environmental, Public

Linda S. Mullenix

Procedure

Lucas A. Powe, Jr.

Public

John A. Robertson

Public, Health

Lawrence G. Sager

Public

Gerald Torres

Environmental, Critical Theories

* Russell Weintraub

Procedure

Jay L. Westbrook

Business

Mark G. Yudof

Public

11.  University of Virginia

Faculty member Areas

Kenneth S. Abraham

Private, Law & Econ

* Vincent Blasi

Public

Curtis A. Bradley

International

Jack L. Goldsmith III

International

John C. Jeffries, Jr.

Public

Edmund W. Kitch

IP, Law & Econ

Michael J. Klarman

Legal History, Public

John T. Monahan

Law & Social Science

John Norton Moore

International

Jeffrey O’Connell

Private

Daniel R. Ortiz

Public

Glen O. Robinson

Public

Elizabeth S. Scott

Family

Robert E. Scott

Business, Law & Econ

Paul B. Stephan III

International

G. Edward White

Legal History

13.  Northwestern University

Faculty member Areas

Ronald J. Allen

Criminal, Procedure

Steven G. Calabresi

Public

Anthony D’Amato

International, Jurisprudence

Andrew Koppelman

Public

Fred S. McChesney

Business, Law & Econ

John O. McGinnis

Public

Martin H. Redish

Public, Procedure

Dorothy E. Roberts

Critical Theories, Criminal

David S. Ruder

Business

Richard E. Speidel

Business, Private

* Charles Taylor

Jurisprudence

Gordon Wood

Legal History

13.  University of Pennsylvania

Faculty member Areas

Anita L. Allen-Castellitto

Public, Jurisprudence

Regina Austin

Critical Theories

C. Edwin Baker

Public

Stephen B. Burbank

Procedure

* Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.

Procedure, Legal Ethics

Jason Scott Johnson

Law & Econ, Environmental

Seth F. Kreimer

Public

Charles W. Mooney, Jr.

Business

Paul H. Robinson

Criminal

Edward B. Rock

Business

Edward L. Rubin

Business, Public

15.  Duke University

Faculty member Areas

Katharine T. Bartlett

Critical Theories

James D.A. Boyle

IP, Critical Theories

Michael H. Bradley

Business

James D. Cox

Business

Jerome M. Culp

Critical Theories

* Walter E. Dellinger III

Public

Deborah A. DeMott

Business, Private

H. Jefferson Powell

Public

Jerome H. Reichman

IP

Thomas D. Rowe, Jr.

Procedure

William W. van Alstyne

Public

Neil Vidmar

Law & Social Science

15.  University of Colorado, Boulder

Faculty member Areas

Harold H. Bruff

Public

David H. Getches

Environmental

Lakshman D. Guruswamy

Environmental

Christopher B. Mueller

Procedure

Robert F. Nagel

Public

Pierre J. Schlag

Critical Theories

Charles F. Wilkinson

Environmental, Public

15.  University of Miami

Faculty member Areas

Anthony V. Alfieri

Legal Ethics, Critical Theories

Mary Irene Coombs

Criminal

John Hart Ely

Public

Marc A. Fajer

Public, Critical Theories

A. Michael Froomkin

IP, Public

Michael H. Graham

Procedure

Martha Mahoney

Family, Critical Theories

Jonathan S. Simon

Law & Social Science, Criminal

Francisco X. Valdes

Critical Theories

* William Twining

Jurisprudence

Bruce J. Winick

Criminal, Law & Social Science

18.  Emory University

Faculty member Areas

David J. Bederman

International

Harold J. Berman

Comparative, Legal History

Anita Bernstein

Private, Critical Theories

William J. Carney

Business

Martha Fineman

Family, Critical Theories

Peter Hay

Comparative, Procedure

William T. Mayton

Public

Michael J. Perry

Public

Paul H. Rubin

Law & Econ

John Witte, Jr.

Law & Religion

18.  University of California, Los Angeles

Faculty member Areas

Richard L. Abel

Law & Social Science, Critical Theories, Legal Ethics

Stephen Bainbridge

Business

* Kimberle Crenshaw

Critical Theories

Stephen A. Gardbaum

Public, Comparative, Jurisprudence

Kenneth W. Graham, Jr.

Procedure

Joel F. Handler

Public

Cheryl Harris

Critical Theories

Russell B. Korobkin

Law & Econ, Private

Christine Littleton

Critical Theories

Lynn M. LoPucki

Business

Daniel Hays Lowenstein

Public

Frances E. Olson

Critical Theories

William B. Rubenstein

Public

Lynn Stout

Business

Eugene Volokh

Public

Stephen C. Yeazell

Procedure

20.  George Washington University

Faculty member Areas

Jerome A. Barron

Public

Paul Butler

Critical Theories, Criminal

Robert J. Cottrol

Legal History, Public

Charles B. Craver

Labor, ADR

Jack H. Friedenthal

Procedure

William E. Kovacic

Business

Ira C. Lupu

Public

Lawrence E. Mitchell

Business

Thomas D. Morgan

Business

Sean D. Murphy

International

Richard J. Pierce, Jr.

Public

Jeffrey Rosen

Public

Stephen A. Saltzburg

Criminal, Procedure

Michael L. Selmi

Critical Theories, Public

Louis B. Sohn

International

Jonathan R. Turley

Public

21.  University of Illinois

Faculty member Areas

William J. Davey

International

Matthew W. Finkin

Labor/Employment

Kit Kinports

Criminal

Richard H. McAdams

Law & Econ, Criminal

Michael S. Moore

Criminal, Jurisprudence

Richard W. Painter

Business, Legal Ethics

Larry E. Ribstein

Business

Thomas Ulen

Law & Econ

21.  University of Southern California

Faculty member Areas

Alexander M. Capron

Health

Erwin Chemerinsky

Public, Procedure

Susan R. Estrich

Public, Critical Theories

Elizabeth Garrett

Public

Gillian K. Hadfield

Law & Econ

Edward J. McCaffery

Tax

W. David Slawson

Private

Matthew L. Spitzer

Law & Econ, Public

Christopher D. Stone

Environmental

Eric L. Talley

Law & Econ, Business

Charles H. Whitebread

Criminal

23.  George Mason University

Faculty member Areas

David E. Bernstein

Public, Legal History

Ernest Gellhorn

Public, Business

Mark F. Grady

Law & Econ, Private

Bruce Kobayashi

Law & Econ, Business

Nelson Lund

Public, Law & Econ

Daniel D. Polsby

Law & Econ, Public

Ronald D. Rotunda

Public, Legal Ethics

Maxwell L. Stearns

Public, Law & Econ

Gordon Tullock

Law & Econ

Todd J. Zywicki

Law & Econ, Business

23.  Vanderbilt University

Faculty member Areas

James F. Blumstein

Health

James W. Ely, Jr.

Legal History

Nancy J. King

Criminal

Harold G. Maier

International

Robert K. Rasmussen

Business, Law & Econ

Suzanna Sherry

Public

Kent D. Syverud

Legal Ethics, Private

Randall S. Thomas

Business

Robert B. Thompson

Business

Nicholas S. Zeppos

Public

25.  Arizona State University

Faculty member Areas

Robert N. Clinton

Public, Legal History

Ira Mark Ellman

Family

Robert A. Gorman

IP, Labor

Owen D. Jones

Law & Science

Dennis S. Karjala

Business

David Kaye

Procedure, Law & Science

Jeffrie G. Murphy

Jurisprudence, Criminal

Michael J. Saks

Law & Social Science, Procedure

Rebecca Tsosie

Public

25.  Boston University

Faculty member Areas

George J. Annas

Health

Randy E. Barnett

Public, Private

Robert G. Bone

Procedure, IP

Wendy J. Gordon

IP

Keith N. Hylton

Law & Econ

Susan P. Koniak

Legal Ethics

Andrew Kull

Private, Legal History

Gary S. Lawson

Public

David B. Lyons

Jurisprudence

Tracey Maclin

Criminal

Nancy J. Moore

Legal Ethics

Maureen O’Rourke

IP

Kenneth Simons

Criminal

Larry W. Yackle

Public

25.  Brooklyn Law School

Faculty member Areas

Margaret A. Berger

Procedure

Neil B. Cohen

Business

Nan D. Hunter

Public

Roberta S. Karmel

Business

Michael P. Madow

Public

Gary Minda

Critical Theories

Norman S. Poser

Business

Elizabeth M. Schneider

Public, Critical Theories

Anthony J. Sebok

Private, Jurisprudence

Lawrence M. Solan

Public

Aaron D. Twerski

Private

25.  University of Arizona

Faculty member Areas

Jean Braucher

Business

Gabriel Chin

Critical Theories, Public

Dan B. Dobbs

Private

Toni M. Massaro

Procedure, Criminal, Critical Theories

Bruce Sales

Law & Social Science, Criminal

Ted Schneyer

Legal Ethics

Elliott J. Weiss

Business

* David B. Wexler

Law & Social Science, Criminal

Robert Williams

Critical Theories, Public

25.  University of Minnesota

Faculty member Areas

Dan L. Burk

IP

Jim Chen

Public

Donald A. Dripps

Criminal

Barry C. Feld

Criminal

Mary Louise Fellowws

Wills, Critical Theories

Alex M. Johnson

Critical Theories

John H. Matheson

Business

David McGowan

IP, Law & Econ

Michael Stokes Paulsen

Public

E. Thomas Sullivan

Business

Michael Tonry

Criminal

David Weissbrodt

Public

30.  University of Pittsburgh

Faculty member Areas

Douglas M. Branson

Business

Pat K. Chew

Critical Theories

Richard Delgado

Critical Theories, Public

Lawrence A. Frolik

Elderlaw

Jules L. Lobel

Labor, Critical Theories

Alan Meisel

Health

John T. Parry

Health, Public

Welsh S. White

Criminal

30.  University of San Diego

Faculty member Areas

Larry Alexander

Public, Criminal, Jurisprudence

Roy L. Brooks

Critical Theories, Procedure

Ralph H. Folsom

International

* Yale Kamisar

Criminal

Sai Prakash

Public, Business

Michael Rappaport

Public

Daniel B. Rodriguez

Public

Bernard H. Siegan

Public

Steven D. Smith

Public

Thomas A. Smith

Business, Law & Econ

Lawrence Solum

Public, Jurisprudence, IP

Fred C. Zacharias

Legal Ethics

30.  Washington University, St. Louis

Faculty member Areas

Kathleen F. Brickey

Criminal

Rebecca Dresser

Bioethics

Lee Epstein

Public, Law & Social Science

Barbara J. Flagg

Critical Theories

John Owen Haley

Comparative

Daniel L. Keating

Business

Stephen H. Legomsky

Immigration

Ronald M. Levin

Criminal

Daniel R. Mandelker

Environmental, Private

Joel Seligman

Business

33.  Cardozo Law School/Yeshiva University

Faculty member Areas

Lester Brickman

Legal Ethics

David Gray Carlson

Business, Critical Theories

Marci A. Hamilton

IP, Public

Michael E. Herz

Public, Environmental

Michel Rosenfeld

Public, Critical Theories

Barry C. Scheck

Criminal, Procedure

Jeanne Schroeder

Critical Theories

Stewart E. Sterk

Wills, Private

Paul R. Verkuil

Public

Richard H. Weisberg

Public, Law & Literature

33.  Chicago-Kent College of Law

Faculty member Areas

Lori B. Andrews

Bioethics

David J. Gerber

Comparative

Steven L. Harris

Business

Harold J. Krent

Public

Martin H. Malin

Labor/Employment

Sheldon H. Nahmod

Public

Henry H. Perritt, Jr.

IP

A. Dan Tarlock

Environmental

Richard W. Wright

Private, Jurisprudence

33.  Fordham University

Faculty member Areas

Daniel J. Capra

Criminal, Procedure

Mary C. Daly

Legal Ethics

Deborah W. Denno

Criminal

John D. Feerick

Public

Jill E. Fisch

Business

Martin S. Flaherty

Public, Legal History

James Fleming

Public

Bruce A. Green

Legal Ethics

Abner S. Greene

Public

Russell G. Pearce

Legal Ethics

Joseph M. Perillo

Private

Joel R. Reidenberg

IP

Steve Thel

Business

William Treanor

Public

Benjamin C. Zipursky

Private, Jurisprudence

33.  Ohio State University

Faculty member Areas

James J. Brudney

Labor, Law & Social Science

Martha E. Chamallas

Critical Theories

Ruth Colker

Critical Theories, Public

Joshua Dressler

Criminal

Katherine Hunt Federle

Family, Criminal

Edward B. Foley

Public

Deborah Jones Merritt

Law & Social Science, Public

Dale Oesterle

Business

john a. powell

Critical Theories

Peter Shane

Public

Peter P. Swire

IP, Business

Douglas J. Whaley

Business

33.  University of Iowa

Faculty member Areas

David C. Baldus

Criminal, Public

Randall P. Bezanson

Public

Peter D. Blanck

Law & Social Science

Arthur Earl Bonfield

Public

Margaret F. Brinig

Family, Law & Econ

Steven J. Burton

Private, Jurisprudence

Patricia A. Cain

Critical Theories

Herbert Hovenkamp

Business, Legal History

Kenneth J. Kress

Jurisprudence, Health

Adrian K. Wing

Critical Theories

38.  University of California, Davis

Faculty member Areas

John D. Ayer

Business

Alan E. Brownstein

Public, Private

Robert W. Hillman

Business, Private

Bill Ong Hing

Critical Theories

Edward J. Imwinkelried

Procedure

Kevin R. Johnson

Public, Critical Theories

Bruce A. Wolk

Wills

38.  University of California, Hastings

Faculty member Areas

Vikram D. Amar

Public

David L. Faigman

Procedure

Joseph R. Grodin

Public

Mary Kay Kane

Procedure

Charles Lincoln Knapp

Private

John D. Leshy

Environmental

Richard L. Marcus

Procedure

Calvin R. Massey

Public

Ugo A. Mattei

Comparative, Law & Econ

Roger C. Park

Procedure

Naomi Roht-Arriaza

International

D. Kelly Weisberg

Family, Critical Theories

38.  University of Wisconsin, Madison

Faculty member Areas

Ann Althouse

Procedure, Critical Theories

Howard S. Erlanger

Law & Social Science

Linda S. Greene

Public

Neil K. Komesar

Public, Law & Econ

Herbert M. Kritzer

Law & Social Science

Jane E. Larson

Critical Theories

Stewart Macaulay

Private, Law & Social Science

Thomas M. Palay

Legal Ethics

Joel E. Rogers

Public

Jane S. Schacter

Public

D. Gordon Smith

Business

David M. Trubek

Critical Theories

Other Schools Studied:

Boston College

Faculty member Areas

Mark S. Brodin

Procedure

Daniel R. Coquillette

Legal History

Lawrence A. Cunningham

Business

John H. Garvey

Public

Sanford N. Katz

Family

Paul R. McDaniel

Tax

Zygmunt Plater

Environmental

Catherine Wells

Critical Theories, Jurisprudence

David A. Wirth

International

College of William & Mary

Faculty member Areas

Peter A. Alces

Business, Private

Neal E. Devins

Public

Michael Gerhardt

Public

Charles H. Koch

Public

Linda A. Malone

Environmental

Paul Marcus

Criminal

Ronald H. Rosenberg

Environmental, Public

Indiana University, Bloomington

Faculty member Areas

Alfred C. Aman, Jr.

Public

John S. Applegate

Environmental

Craig M. Bradley

Criminal

Fred H. Cate

IP, Public

Daniel O. Conkle

Public

Kenneth Dau-Schmidt

Labor, Law & Econ

Marshall Leaffer

IP

Lauren K. Robel

Public, Procedure

Gene R. Shreve

Procedure

David C. Williams

Public

Susan H. Williams

Public, Critical Theories

Rutgers University, Camden

Faculty member Areas

Linda S. Bosniak

Immigration

Jay M. Feinman

Private, Critical Theories

N.E.H. Hull

Legal History

Donald R. Korobkin

Business

Michael Livingston

Tax

Earl M. Maltz

Public, Legal History

Dennis M. Patterson

Business, Private, Jurisprudence

Rand E. Rosenblatt

Health, Critical Theories

Allan R. Stein

Procedure

Robert F. Williams

Public

Rutgers University, Newark

Faculty member Areas

Alfred W. Blumrosen

Public

Norman L. Cantor

Public

Sherry F. Colb

Criminal

Gary L. Francione

Public, Critical Theories

Alan Hyde

Law & Social Science, Labor, Critical Theories

Howard A. Latin

Environmental

John Leubsdorf

Procedure

Twila L. Perry

Family

James Gray Pope

Public, Legal History

George C. Thomas III

Criminal

University of Florida, Gainesville

Faculty member Areas

Thomas F. Cotter

IP

Nancy E. Dowd

Critical Theories

Michael W. Gordon

International

Jeffrey L. Harrison

Business, Law & Econ

Berta Hernandez-Truyol

Critical Theories

Jerold H. Israel

Criminal

Robert Jerry

Insurance

Joseph W. Little

Private

Lawrence Lokken

Tax

Lars Noah

Public, Health

William H. Page

Business

Juan F. Perea

Critical Theories

Sharon E. Rush

Public, Critical Theories

Christopher Slobogin

Criminal

Walter O. Weyrauch

Family, Comparative

Barbara Bennett Woodhouse

Family, Critical Theories

University of North Carolina

Faculty member Areas

John O. Calmore

Critical Theories

Marion G. Crain

Public

Adrienne D. Davis

Legal History, Critical Theories

Thomas L. Hazen

Business

Donald T. Hornstein

Environmental

Arnold H. Loewy

Criminal

William P. Marshall

Public

Hiroshi Motomura

Immigration

Gene R. Nichol, Jr.

Public, Procedure

John V. Orth

Legal History

Gerald J. Postema

Jurisprudence, Legal Ethics

University of Notre Dame

Faculty member Areas

G. Robert Blakey

Criminal

Gerard V. Bradley

Public

* John Finnis

Jurisprudence

Alan Gunn

Tax

Donald P. Kommers

Comparative

John Copeland Nagle

IP

Dinah L. Shelton

International

Jay Tidmarsh

Procedure

Washington & Lee University

Faculty member Areas

David S. Caudill

Critical Theories

Margaret Howard

Business

Lyman Johnson

Business

Timothy S. Jost

Health

Frederic L. Kirgis

International

Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr.

Public

David Millon

Business

Scott E. Sundby

Public, Criminal

 ◊  Site Sponsor